Peer Reviewer Proces

Peer Reviewer Proces

Every manuscript submitted to the editorial team undergoes an initial screening conducted by the Editorial Board to assess its suitability. Following this stage, selected articles are forwarded to Ahmad Sanusi/peer reviewers for further evaluation through a double-blind review process. After the review, manuscripts are returned to the authors for necessary revisions. The entire process typically takes up to one month.

Each manuscript is assessed by Ahmad Sanusi/peer reviewers based on both substantive content and technical quality. The peer reviewers collaborating with the Journal of Holistic Early Education Dini are experts in the field of Early Childhood Education and related issues. They possess extensive experience in managing and publishing reputable journals at both national and international levels.

All submitted manuscripts are carefully examined by the editorial team. Papers deemed not aligned with the journal’s scope and criteria are promptly rejected without external review. Meanwhile, manuscripts considered to have potential interest for readers are sent to independent reviewers under a double-blind system. Final decisions are made by the editors based on reviewers’ recommendations, which may include rejection, revision, or acceptance. The editor holds full authority in determining which manuscripts are ultimately published.

Review Process:

1. Author submits the manuscript
2. Editorial evaluation (some manuscripts may be rejected or returned prior to review)
3. Double-blind peer review process
4. Editorial decision
5. Notification to the author